VerifyAI vs Self Inspection
Comparing a lightweight, SDK-first photo verification API against Self Inspection's full-service vehicle inspection platform for fleet, rental, and automotive use cases.
Try VerifyAIChoosing Between VerifyAI and Self Inspection
Self Inspection is a San Diego-based AI vehicle inspection platform founded in 2021 by Constantine Yaremtso. The company raised a $3M seed round in February 2025 co-led by Costanoa Ventures and DVx Ventures (run by former Tesla president Jon McNeill), with participation from Westlake Financial. Their platform provides comprehensive vehicle condition assessments using smartphone-captured photos analyzed by AI and validated by human experts.
VerifyAI offers a developer-first, SDK-based photo verification API with transparent per-verification pricing, no annual contracts, and on-device processing. While Self Inspection targets full vehicle condition reports for automotive transactions, VerifyAI focuses on real-time, lightweight verification for parking compliance, damage detection, and proof of delivery.
In this comparison, we examine both platforms across pricing, technology approach, integration experience, and use case fit to help you decide which solution matches your operation.
Quick Verdict
VerifyAI is built for high-volume, real-time verification with transparent per-event pricing and self-service SDK integration. Self Inspection is a full-service vehicle inspection platform with expert-reviewed reports, best suited for automotive transactions like lease returns, trade-ins, and rental fleet assessments.
Choose VerifyAI for lightweight, high-volume verification (parking, POD, quick damage checks) with developer-first integration. Choose Self Inspection if you need comprehensive vehicle condition reports with human expert review for automotive transactions.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Switch Labs | Self Inspection |
|---|---|---|
| Per-Verification Cost We Win | $0.008 | Not publicly available |
| Annual Platform Fee We Win | $0 | Not publicly available |
| Monthly Minimum We Win | None | Not publicly available |
| Annual Commitment We Win | None | Custom contracts |
| Self-Service Signup We Win | ||
| On-Device Processing We Win | ||
| Human Expert Review They Win | ||
| Damage Detection | ||
| Damage Cost Estimation They Win | ||
| OBD2 Mechanical Diagnostics They Win | ||
| Parking Verification We Win | ||
| Proof of Delivery We Win | ||
| Offline Support We Win | ||
| SDK (iOS, Android, RN, Flutter) We Win | ||
| Integration Time We Win | Hours | Days-weeks (professional services) |
| Fraud Detection We Win | ||
| Condition Report with CR Score They Win | ||
| Enterprise Customers They Win | Growing | Avis, Westlake Financial, CarOffer |
Detailed Comparison
Pricing
Self Inspection does not publish pricing on their website. Their model is enterprise sales-driven with custom contracts, and integration includes professional services for onboarding and training. Given their full-service approach with human expert review on every inspection, pricing is likely significantly higher per inspection than a pure software solution.
VerifyAI charges a flat $0.008 per verification with no platform fees, no monthly minimums, and no annual commitment. Volume pricing drops to $0.005 at 100K/month and $0.003 at 1M+/month. Self-service signup means you can start immediately without a sales conversation.
For high-volume operations processing tens of thousands of verifications daily (parking, POD, quick damage checks), VerifyAI's transparent pricing provides predictable costs. For lower-volume, high-value inspections like lease returns or trade-in assessments, Self Inspection's expert-reviewed reports may justify higher per-inspection costs.
Technology & Processing Approach
Self Inspection uses a cloud-based hybrid approach: smartphone-captured photos are uploaded to their servers, processed by AI trained on over 10 million damaged vehicle images, and then reviewed by human automotive experts before generating a final condition report. They identify over 6,000 damage combinations across 50 body parts using separate neural networks for body parts and damage detection.
VerifyAI processes images on-device using edge AI, meaning verification happens locally on the user's phone with sub-second response times. This enables offline capability and keeps image data local for privacy. VerifyAI achieves 99.2% accuracy without requiring human review in the loop.
The trade-off is clear: Self Inspection's expert-reviewed reports offer more comprehensive assessments with repair cost estimates, but require cloud processing and review time. VerifyAI's on-device approach delivers instant results for real-time verification workflows where speed matters more than detailed cost breakdowns.
Integration & Developer Experience
Self Inspection provides a REST API and white-label platform options, but does not offer a self-service SDK or public documentation. Their integration page emphasizes professional services: hands-on support to train employees and set up the platform. No app download is required for end users, as inspections can be triggered via text or email links.
VerifyAI offers a self-service SDK for iOS, Android, React Native, and Flutter with 3-line initialization and publicly available documentation. Most teams go live within a day without needing a sales or onboarding process.
If you need to embed verification directly into your mobile app with minimal friction, VerifyAI's SDK-first approach is significantly faster to integrate. If you need a standalone inspection workflow triggered via links and managed through a dashboard, Self Inspection's approach may suit you without custom development.
Use Case Focus
Self Inspection focuses on comprehensive vehicle condition assessments for automotive transactions: lease-end inspections, rental fleet check-in/check-out, trade-in evaluations, repossession documentation, marketplace vehicle listings, and auction assessments. Their reports include exterior, interior, tire, and mechanical condition with CR scores and repair cost estimates.
VerifyAI is designed for high-frequency, lightweight verification events: confirming proper parking of micromobility vehicles, detecting damage during fleet check-ins, and validating proof of delivery. These are quick, real-time checks rather than comprehensive vehicle assessments.
There is overlap in damage detection, but the depth differs significantly. Self Inspection provides detailed repair cost estimates with body parts and labor breakdowns. VerifyAI provides fast damage presence detection for operational workflows. The right choice depends on whether you need a quick verification or a detailed vehicle condition report.
Company & Track Record
Self Inspection was founded in 2021 and raised $3M in seed funding in February 2025 from Costanoa Ventures, DVx Ventures, and Westlake Financial. They count Avis (the third-largest U.S. rental car provider), CarOffer (a CarGurus-owned digital wholesaler), and Westlake Financial (handling 1M+ annual vehicle transactions) as customers. Their team includes former leaders from Apple, NVIDIA, and Coinbase.
Self Inspection has strong validation in the automotive transaction space, with enterprise customers that process high volumes of vehicle assessments. Westlake Financial exclusively uses Self Inspection for trade-ins, remarketing, and repossession assessments.
VerifyAI is newer to market with a focus on developer-first integration, transparent pricing, and broad verification capabilities. While Self Inspection has the enterprise customer edge in automotive transactions, VerifyAI's self-service model enables faster adoption for teams that don't require full vehicle condition reports.
Pros & Cons
Switch Labs
Pros
- Transparent per-verification pricing ($0.008, no hidden fees)
- No annual contracts, platform fees, or monthly minimums
- On-device processing with sub-second response times
- Self-service SDK for iOS, Android, React Native, and Flutter
- Integration in hours, not days or weeks
- Broader verification types (parking, damage, POD, fraud detection)
- Offline support for areas with poor connectivity
Cons
- No human expert review layer for quality assurance
- No repair cost estimation or detailed damage breakdowns
- No OBD2 mechanical diagnostics
- Fewer published enterprise case studies
Self Inspection
Pros
- Expert-reviewed reports ensuring high accuracy
- Comprehensive damage cost estimates with labor breakdowns
- OBD2 mechanical diagnostics for ICE vehicles
- Enterprise customers including Avis and Westlake Financial
- Detailed condition reports with CR scoring system
- Covers 6,000+ damage combinations across 50 body parts
Cons
- No public pricing (enterprise sales required)
- No self-service SDK or public API documentation
- Cloud-based processing (no offline or on-device support)
- Integration requires professional services and training
- No parking verification or proof of delivery features
Which Should You Choose?
Choose VerifyAI If You...
- Need high-volume, real-time verification (parking, POD, quick damage checks)
- Want transparent per-verification pricing without enterprise contracts
- Need to integrate a verification SDK into your mobile app quickly
- Require on-device processing for speed and offline capability
- Prefer self-service signup over enterprise sales cycles
- Operate in micromobility, delivery, or logistics beyond automotive
Choose Self Inspection If You...
- Need comprehensive vehicle condition reports for automotive transactions
- Require expert-reviewed damage assessments with repair cost estimates
- Want OBD2 mechanical diagnostics included in inspections
- Need detailed CR scores for lease returns, trade-ins, or remarketing
- Prefer a managed platform with professional onboarding services
- Operate in auto lending, rental fleets, or vehicle remarketing
Frequently Asked Questions
Need Fast, Lightweight Vehicle Verification?
Real-time photo verification at $0.008 each. No expert review delays, no enterprise contracts, no minimums.
Get Started with VerifyAI