New:Thread Pilot—AI follow-ups for Gmail.
Learn more
Image CompressorvsSquoosh

Switch Labs vs Squoosh

Both are browser-based image compressors. Here's how they compare for different use cases.

Try Switch Labs Free

Two Browser-Based Compression Tools

Squoosh is Google's open-source image compression tool, known for its side-by-side comparison feature and extensive format support.

Switch Labs Image Compressor focuses on batch processing and simplicity, making it ideal for compressing multiple images quickly.

Both process images locally in your browser, ensuring privacy. Let's compare their strengths and ideal use cases.

Quick Verdict

Switch Labs is better for batch processing multiple images quickly. Squoosh excels at fine-tuning compression settings for individual images with its visual comparison tool.

Choose Switch Labs for everyday bulk compression. Choose Squoosh when you need precise control over individual image settings.

Feature Comparison

FeatureSwitch LabsSquoosh
Batch Processing
We Win
Yes (50+ files)No (1 at a time)
Side-by-Side Preview
They Win
Local Processing
PNG Compression
JPG Compression
WebP Conversion
AVIF Support
They Win
Resize Images
Fine-Tune Settings
They Win
BasicAdvanced
ZIP Download
We Win
Mobile Friendly
We Win
Limited

Detailed Comparison

Batch Processing

We Win

Switch Labs allows you to upload and compress 50+ images at once, downloading them all as a ZIP file. This is a huge time-saver for web projects.

Squoosh processes one image at a time. While great for tweaking individual images, it's tedious when you have many files to compress.

Compression Control

They Win

Squoosh offers incredible control over compression settings with real-time previews. You can adjust quality, choose specific codecs, and see exactly how each setting affects the output.

Switch Labs offers simpler controls with quality presets. It's faster to use but less precise for users who want granular control.

Format Support

They Win

Squoosh supports AVIF, the newest image format offering better compression than WebP. It also offers more codec options for each format.

Switch Labs covers the most common formats (PNG, JPG, WebP, GIF) which handles 99% of use cases, but lacks AVIF support.

Pros & Cons

Switch Labs

Pros

  • Process 50+ images at once
  • Download all as ZIP file
  • Simpler, faster workflow
  • Better mobile experience
  • GIF compression support
  • No learning curve

Cons

  • No side-by-side preview
  • Less granular compression controls
  • No AVIF format support

Squoosh

Pros

  • Side-by-side comparison preview
  • AVIF format support
  • Very granular compression controls
  • Open source (Google project)
  • PWA installable

Cons

  • One image at a time only
  • No batch processing
  • No ZIP download
  • Steeper learning curve
  • Less mobile-friendly interface

Which Should You Choose?

Choose Switch Labs If You...

  • Need to compress multiple images at once
  • Want a simple, fast workflow
  • Prefer downloading all images as a ZIP
  • Work frequently on mobile devices
  • Don't need AVIF format

Choose Squoosh If You...

  • Want to fine-tune individual images
  • Need the side-by-side quality preview
  • Want AVIF format support
  • Enjoy tweaking compression settings
  • Only compress one image at a time

Frequently Asked Questions

Need to Compress Multiple Images?

Switch Labs handles batch compression that Squoosh can't. Try it now.

Batch Compress Images

Contact

Tell us what you're building and we'll get in touch fast

Ship a proof-of-concept, integrate Metro2, or hand off the workflow entirely—we respond within one business day and loop in the right Switch Labs partner for your stack.

Response Time
< 24 hours
Delivery Options
Product | Services

By submitting you agree to let Switch Labs contact you about relevant products and services.